Robert Treat wrote:
> On Saturday 12 August 2006 16:16, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 05:11:03PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 10:59:45AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > > > Are we sure we don't want the patch for a non-subquery version of
> > > > > > SET ROW for 8.2?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > o Allow UPDATE tab SET ROW (col, ...) = (...) for updating
> > > > > > multiple columns
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems to be moderately useful as a notational convenience for
> > > > > now.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is it too hard to rip it back out once the full row support
> > > > > arrives? That seems speculation at best anyway.
> > > >
> > > > That's what I was thinking. Glad someone else replied. ;-)
> > >
> > > If you're looking for votes, +1. I'll gladly take a subset of the
> > > SQL standard UPDATE table SET (...) = (...) over having nothing.
> >
> > +1 here, too. :)
> >
>
> +1
I am working now to get this into 8.2.
-- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +