Re: 64-bit integers for GUC

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Treat
Тема Re: 64-bit integers for GUC
Дата
Msg-id 200607302110.46111.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: 64-bit integers for GUC  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Ответы Re: 64-bit integers for GUC  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 14:28, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Peter,
>
> > I wonder whether platforms with INT64_IS_BROKEN can address more than 2GB
> > of memory anyway.
>
> To be quite frank, current PostgreSQL can't effectively use more than
> 256mb of work_mem anyway.  We'd like to fix that, but it's not fixed yet
> AFAIK.
>

Josh, can you clarify this statement for me? Using work mem of higher than 
256MB is common practice in certain cases (db restore for example).  Are you 
speaking in a high volume OLTP sense, or something beyond this?

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Rod Taylor
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] extension for sql update
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 64-bit integers for GUC