Re: Anyone looking to be completed for 8.2?

I don't like last minute things so i'll pass on this one.
I am sure 8.2.x will come soon and i'll have another chance.

On Saturday 29 July 2006 19:56, Robert Treat wrote:
> You need to send it as a patch to pgsql-patches for code review.  Include a
> description of what it is and pointers on how to use it. Also make note
> that you think it should be added to contrib with reasons why.  You also
> need to do this pretty much today... code freeze is Aug 1, so if something
> isnt seen before then, it's not likely to get in.
>
> Robert Treat
>
> On Saturday 29 July 2006 08:06, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> > Practically i moved it to beta.
> > I am still left to document the code better and perhaps improve
> > the error messages and clean some code fragments but it is finished
> > feature wise and i've done a lot of testing on it.
> > Do you need anything from me to put it in contrib or you copy it
> > directly from pgfoundry?
> >
> > On Saturday 29 July 2006 02:35, Jim Nasby wrote:
> > > Sorry for the noise, but I haven't seen this on -patches. Is it in
> > > now? Should we be extending feature freeze?
> > >
> > > On Jul 15, 2006, at 7:33 PM, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> > > > My project is doing what it should do. Still missing one feature i
> > > > want to
> > > > enter before people will start to use it but other than that i
> > > > tested it
> > > > extensively. It can take a few days.
> > > > still needs a lot of code clean ups and i need to move it from 8.1
> > > > dynamic loaded function interface to 8.2
> > > > but i am guessing it shouldn't be something difficult?
> > > > The code cleanups and some more features will be finished by the end
> > > > of soc.
> > > >
> > > > Is there anything else to do than just copying the files into
> > > > contrib?
> > > >
> > > > Aside from the obvious full disjunction functionality i have a
> > > > feeling people
> > > > will benefit from the code itself as an example since it uses many
> > > > aspects of
> > > > postgresql.
> > > >
> > > > On Saturday 15 July 2006 22:50, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > >> SoC Mentors,
> > > >>
> > > >> Feature freeze is officially 2 weeks away.  Just to check, are
> > > >> there any
> > > >> SoC projects which look to be both:
> > > >>
> > > >> a) generally applicable enough to be in 8.2, and
> > > >> b) near-production quality by the end of SoC?
> > > >>
> > > >> We said at the beginning of SoC that we'd re-evaluate near feature
> > > >> freeze
> > > >> time if we wanted to wait for an SoC feature; is there anything?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards,
> > > >         Tzahi.
> > > > --
> > > > Tzahi Fadida
> > > > Blog: http://tzahi.blogsite.org | Home Site: http://tzahi.webhop.info
> > > > WARNING TO SPAMMERS:  see at
> > > > http://members.lycos.co.uk/my2nis/spamwarning.html
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------(end of
> > > > broadcast)---------------------------
> > > > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> > > >
> > > >                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
> > > Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
> > > vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------(end of
> > > broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the
> > > planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining
> > > column's datatypes do not match

--
Regards,
        Tzahi.
--
Tzahi Fadida
Blog: http://tzahi.blogsite.org | Home Site: http://tzahi.webhop.info
WARNING TO SPAMMERS:  see at
http://members.lycos.co.uk/my2nis/spamwarning.html