Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> >Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >>
> >>Which version of Replication do we throw in here?
> >>
> >IMHO, the current players should be encouraged create a joint portfolio
> >that makes sense.
>
> All due respect but that is a pipe dream.
Why? The current players list reduces to
1. Slony-I
So it's not that difficult to get them to agree with themselves.
The other possible players are all excused:
- DBmirror: the author considers it obsolete
- Postgres-R: it's still under development
- erServer: obsolete, abandoned, inferior to Slony-I anyway
- Mammoth Replicator: proprietary
Am I missing anyone?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.