Re: Impact of vacuum full...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bill Moran
Тема Re: Impact of vacuum full...
Дата
Msg-id 20060721122602.0312df7c.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Impact of vacuum full...  (Erik Jones <erik@myemma.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:35:17 -0500
Erik Jones <erik@myemma.com> wrote:

> Csaba Nagy wrote:
[snip]
> That is an excellent idea, however, what are the effects of CLUSTER on
> empty tables?  Considering that most of our queue tables sit empty until
> their used, our main concern is keep the disk space that they use
> available and our 'cleaning' activities will be done whenever the tables
> empty out (unless they are scheduled for use within, say, an hour) I
> have to wonder at whether or not CLUSTER would do anything to an empty
> table with no actual data to cluster.

Based on that description, have you considered using TRUNCATE to clear out
the tables when you're done using them?  Truncate is faster than DELETE
and I believe it's the equivalient of dropping and recreating the table,
which means it will free up the space.

--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Erik Jones
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Impact of vacuum full...
Следующее
От: Csaba Nagy
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [JDBC] Is what I want possible and if so how?