Re: Fixed length datatypes. WAS [GENERAL] UUID's as

On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 09:12:32AM +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> The split make sense since clients often have powerful UUID utilities handy 
> and hence have limited or no use for such utilities in the database (true 
> for all .NET and Java clients). Some PL's will also enable such packages 
> out of the box.

I agree about splitting the utilities, except that I think the database
should be able to generate UUIDs somehow.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461