Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >Right, but even when we have that, should we be able to dump a view just
> >like a real table?
> >
> >
> >
>
> Wouldn't it just be this? :
>
> COPY (SELECT * from viewname) TO ...
>
> I don't see why views should be special. Tables clearly should be
> because we can open them directly.
Ah, I didn't think of that. Good idea. So we don't need this patch?
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +