Placement of 64-bit libraries (offtopic)
| От | Steinar H. Gunderson |
|---|---|
| Тема | Placement of 64-bit libraries (offtopic) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20060613063059.GA6316@uio.no обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Placement of 64-bit libraries (offtopic)
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 10:44:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > (Personally, if I'd designed it, the libraries would actually live in > /usr/lib32 and /usr/lib64, and /usr/lib would be a symlink to whichever > you needed it to be at the moment. Likewise for /usr/bin.) Actually, there have been plans for doing something like this in Debian for a while: Let stuff live in /lib/i686-linux-gnu and /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu (lib32 and lib64 doesn't really scale, once you start considering stuff like "ia64 can emulate hppa"), and adjust paths and symlinks as fit. It's still a long way to go, though. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: