Re: Why do we want to %Remove behavior of postmaster -o

Am Samstag, 3. Juni 2006 04:27 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Actually, the TODO item is very badly worded.  The idea is to get rid of
> the spelling differences between postmaster and postgres options, and
> then there will be no need for '-o' because you'll just say what you
> want --- that is, "-o -foo" and "-foo" will be interchangeable.

This is already done.

I suppose that the idea was that the -o option should be phased out over a 
couple of releases.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/