Re: plperl's ppport.h out of date?
| От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: plperl's ppport.h out of date? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20060531072220.GD23169@svana.org обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: plperl's ppport.h out of date? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: plperl's ppport.h out of date?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:35:12AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > FWIW, it looks like a large part of the bloat in the newer file is > in-line documentation, which we hardly need to include in our > distribution. I'll leave it to someone more familiar with Perl to > determine whether we want to try to use a slimmed-down copy of the > up-to-date output. Not sure whether it's worth it, but this sed line strips the POD docs: sed -e '/^=/,/^=cut/d' < ppport.h Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: