Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?)
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20060522191418.GA13518@surnet.cl обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?) (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:41:59AM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > > CREATE TRIGGER name { BEFORE | AFTER } { event [ OR ... ] }
> > > ON table FOR EACH STATEMENT
> > > EXECUTE PROCEDURE funcname ( arguments )
> >
> > And that doesn't give you any information on the rows that were
> > modified. Other RDBMSes will provide a NEW rowset and an OLD rowset that
> > you can select from inside the trigger as if they were real tables.
>
> Is this on the TODO list? It doesn't seem too difficult to create a
> tuplestore and store the NEW and OLD tuples there and pass the whole
> set to the trigger.
OTOH it would be nice to be able to save only the TIDs of the tuples,
not the tuples themselves ... maybe create a "TIDstore"?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: