Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
| От | Jim C. Nasby |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20060520153426.GW64371@pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? (Lukas Smith <smith@pooteeweet.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:36:25AM +0200, Lukas Smith wrote: > Hi, > > I really think that PostgreSQL could benefit from a packaged solution > that incorporates a lot of the contrib stuff (tsearch2, maybe even some > replication setups ..). I really like the approach that PostgreSQL is a > clean yet highly extensible base from which other people can build their > specific tools. I think we're starting to see some of that, with things like the live CD. What I'd rather see time spent on is a framework that makes it easier to grab things from pgFoundry. To use a bad example, think CPAN for PostgreSQL. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: