Re: [WIP] The relminxid addition, try 3
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [WIP] The relminxid addition, try 3 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20060508190221.GF3351@surnet.cl обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [WIP] The relminxid addition, try 3 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [WIP] The relminxid addition, try 3
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote: > But why do you need your own xlogging at all? Shouldn't these actions > be perfectly ordinary updates of the relevant catalog tuples? The XLog entry can be smaller, AFAICT (we need to store the whole new tuple in a heap_update, right?). If that's not a worthy goal I'll gladly rewrite this piece of code. Ah, there's another reason, and it's that I'm rewriting the tuple in place, not calling heap_update. I'm not sure if I can reuse log_heap_update for this purpose -- I'll take a look. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: