On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:11:34PM -0500, Steve V wrote:
> >When that rule should never fire (the id hasn't changed). If I change
> >the conditional of the rule to something that must always be false
> >(like false, or 1 = 0), it will still behave in this manner.
>
> Does anyone know what's going on here? I'm experiencing an identical
> situation, and it doesn't seem logical. If it evaluates to false, why
> on earth is the function result set attempting to be returned? Maybe
> not a bug, but definitely unexpected behavior
A rule is a macro. This means that the expression in the rule will
always happen. If you have a rule to do a SELECT after an UPDATE, the
client will see the results of the SELECT.
You almost never want RULEs. It's not clear what you want to do, but a
trigger is more likely to do what you want (as well as a lot easier to
understand).
If you set debug_print_rewritten=on you should be able to see what is
actually being executed...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.