Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
| От | Jim C. Nasby |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20060426220929.GY97354@pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:27:18AM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote: > If you haven't actually run a heavy benchmark of postgresql on the two > architectures, please don't make your decision based on other > benchmarks. Since you've got both a D920 and an X2 3800, that'd be a > great place to start. Mock up some benchmark with a couple dozen > threads hitting the server at once and see if the Intel can keep up. It Or better yet, use dbt* or even pgbench so others can reproduce... -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: