Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
| От | mark@mark.mielke.cc |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20060425183817.GA9241@mark.mielke.cc обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 01:33:38PM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> Sad, cause the AMD is, on a price / performance scale, twice the
> processor for the same money as the Intel.
Maybe a year or two ago. Prices are all coming down. Intel more
than AMD.
AMD still seems better - but not X2, and it depends on the workload.
X2 sounds like biggotry against Intel... :-)
Cheers,
mark
--
mark@mielke.cc / markm@ncf.ca / markm@nortel.com __________________________
. . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ |
| | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
and in the darkness bind them...
http://mark.mielke.cc/
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: