Re: A successor for PQgetssl

* Martijn van Oosterhout (kleptog@svana.org) wrote:
> Seriously, if people want to do really sophisticated things with the
> SSL library, they should setup s_tunnel instead. If we wanted to let

I certainly agree with all the rest but I'm just not sure I can agree
with you here.  While s_tunnel is nice it's not always an option and I
think it *would* be nice to have Postgres support things like CRLs and
OCSP but more from the server-side of things than the client-side.
Thanks,
    Stephen