* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> "shakahshakah@gmail.com" <shakahshakah@gmail.com> writes:
> > Am I correct in assuming that when Postgres prepared the SQL to execute
> > the "insert function" that the existing rules on the base table were
> > also resolved at that time? If so, is there any way to avoid that
> > behavior?
>
> Yes; no. We are working on infrastructure to automatically redo
> prepared plans when relevant catalog entries change, but it's not there
> today :-(
Wouldn't it be possible to use 'execute' instead and have the plan
re-generated each time that way? It'd be less efficient but I think
it'd work as a work-around...
Just some thoughts,
Thanks,
Stephen