Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > Structure for the human-consumable output or for something that would be
> > machine-parsed? ISTM it would be best to keep the current output as-is,
> > and provide some other means for producing machine-friendly output,
> > presumably in a table format.
>
> How about (well-formed) XML format?
A friend developed a patch for this. He offered to post it but I don't
think there was any reaction at all.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.