On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 10:39:03PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> AFAICS, the main part of the type system that isn't modular is the
> support for type parameters (a/k/a typmod), such as the maximum length
> for varchar or the precision/scale for numeric. We could certainly
> invent an API for interpreting such parameters. But in the current state
> of the system the types that have such parameters have to be hard-wired
> into the SQL grammar, and I don't see how to get rid of that hard-wiring
> without breaking a whole lot of stuff. Any bison gurus hanging about?
We've been here before:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-08/msg01142.php
Turns out it isn't too hard, except there are a number of limitations.
Unfortunatly I seem to have the deleted the patch I created then. :(
Summerising the thread then:
- It made some changes to what was and wasn't a reserved word.
- Character sets for CHAR types still fall outside the system.
- Some other changes in behaviour
I'm not sure if much has changed since that discussion.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.