Re: Solaris 10 ZFS Postgresql request for comments

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim C. Nasby
Тема Re: Solaris 10 ZFS Postgresql request for comments
Дата
Msg-id 20060304033353.GP82012@pervasive.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Solaris 10 ZFS Postgresql request for comments  (Reid Thompson <reid.thompson@ateb.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 12:30:32PM -0500, Reid Thompson wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm querying for feedback/comments.  Wondering what the list thinks of
> the following.
>
> Assume this is to provide a production database for a small company or a
> department.  Production hours 5am-9pm for the most part so night-time
> downtime if/when necessary would not be a problem.
>
> Platform:
>  SUN ultra 20 or intel/amd based PC
>  Hard drive1      = OS Solaris 10(+)
>  Hard drives2 & 3 = ZFS mirrored pool with PostgreSQL intalled
>  Hard drives4-N   = ZFS raided PGDATA
>
>
> Would this be considered viable?
> Has anyone implemented anything similar?
> Any obvious pitfalls that anyone is aware of?

I'd recommend drive 1 & 2 be mirrored witheverything but the table data,
which would go on a raid 10 of the rest of the drives via a tablespace.
That way you won't lose the box if drive 1 fails. You also probably
don't want raid5, if you were thinking about that...
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Insert fails when it shouldn't
Следующее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Fwd: Schema Question]