Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Chris said he did:
> >> Well all I did to fix it on FreeBSD was to remove the '-o "$LOGNAME" =
> >> 'root'' bit...
> > so I figured the patch would help, no?
>
> No, because there's no good reason to suppose that $USER wouldn't be set.
But if USER is set, why check LOGNAME?
> I think we should remove that entire code block, and instead check for a
> zero value of EffectiveUser after doing the id bit.
>
> (I'm not finding it right now, but I'm pretty sure that the SUS
> specifies that numeric userid == 0 for superuser, whereas "root" is not
> required to be the name, so this would be more correct anyway.)
Can we assume 'id' is on all unix systems?
-- Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us SRA OSS, Inc. http://www.sraoss.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +