Re: fsync and battery-backed caches
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: fsync and battery-backed caches |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200602280106.k1S16DK16068@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: fsync and battery-backed caches ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: fsync and battery-backed caches
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 11:12:57AM +0100, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
> > Javier Somoza schrieb:
> > >
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > Is it secure to disable fsync havin battery-backed disk cache?
> > >
> > > Thx
> > >
> > No. fsync moves the data from OS memory cache to disk-adaptor
> > cache which is required to benefit from battery backup.
>
> More importantly, in guarantees that data is committed to non-volatile
> storage in such a way that PostgreSQL can recover from a crash without
> corruption.
>
> If you have a battery-backed controller and turn on write caching you
> shouldn't see much effect from fsync anyway.
We do mention battery-backed cache in our docs:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/wal.html
If it is unclear, please let us know.
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
SRA OSS, Inc. http://www.sraoss.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: