Re: Search machine is ready
| От | Robert Treat |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Search machine is ready |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200602171337.29595.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Search machine is ready (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Search machine is ready
|
| Список | pgsql-www |
On Friday 17 February 2006 09:53, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2006 17:40 schrieb Dave Page:
> > - Vendor changes. I don't like to run packages I know to have been
> > changed by the vendor - for example, it was noted the other day that the
> > Debian PostgreSQL packages contains patches that aren't in PGDG releases.
> > In this case the only OS vendor I would trust with a modified PostgreSQL
> > is Red Hat, for fairly obvious reasons.
>
> Clearly, you have never looked into the Debian packages. Otherwise you
> would have seen that the patches are completely trivial and not related to
> changing any functionality.
Clearly somebody hasn't looked into the Debian packages, lest they would be
familiar with the completely debian specific binaries like clusterdb and
pg_wrapper...
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: