Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures

От: Frank Wiles
Тема: Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures
Дата: ,
Msg-id: 20060123112526.1ee25dcd.frank@wiles.org
(см: обсуждение, исходный текст)
Ответ на: Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures  ("Dave Dutcher")
Список: pgsql-performance

Скрыть дерево обсуждения

Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures  (Rikard Pavelic, )
 Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures  ("Jim C. Nasby", )
  Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures  (Rikard Pavelic, )
   Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures  ("Jim C. Nasby", )
    Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures  (Rikard Pavelic, )
    Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures  (Rikard Pavelic, )
    Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures  (Marcos, )
     Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures  (Markus Schaber, )
      Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures  (Marcos, )
       Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures  ("Dave Dutcher", )
        Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures  (Frank Wiles, )

On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:23:17 -0600
"Dave Dutcher" <> wrote:

> I don't think pgpool is what you need.  If I understand pgpool
> correctly, pgpool lets you pool multiple postgres servers together.
> You are just looking for database connection pooling.

  While pgpool can let you pool together multiple backend servers,
  it also functions well as just a connection pooling device with
  only one backend.

 ---------------------------------
   Frank Wiles <>
   http://www.wiles.org
 ---------------------------------



В списке pgsql-performance по дате сообщения:

От: "Adnan HOTMAIL"
Дата:
Сообщение: unsubscribe
От: Brad Nicholson
Дата:
Сообщение: Investigating IO Saturation