Re: NOT LIKE much faster than LIKE?
| От | Jim C. Nasby |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: NOT LIKE much faster than LIKE? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20060111210221.GD63175@pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: NOT LIKE much faster than LIKE? (Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@cpushare.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: NOT LIKE much faster than LIKE?
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 09:39:47PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > CREATE INDEX indexname ON tablename ( position(' PREEMPT ' in kernel_version) );
>
> The index only helps the above query with = 0 and not the one with != 0,
> but it seems not needed in practice.
Hrm. If you need indexing then, you'll probably have to do 2 indexes
with a WHERE clause...
CREATE INDEX ... WHERE position(...) = 0;
CREATE INDEX ... WHERE position(...) != 0;
I suspect this is because of a lack of stats for functional indexes.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: