Re: Speed of different procedural language
| От | Steinar H. Gunderson |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Speed of different procedural language |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20051221213810.GA27113@uio.no обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Speed of different procedural language (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Speed of different procedural language
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 02:24:42PM -0700, Michael Fuhr wrote: > The difference is clear only in specific cases; just because you > saw a 10x increase in some cases doesn't mean you can expect that > kind of increase, or indeed any increase, in others. I've seen > PL/pgSQL beat all other PL/* challengers handily many times, > especially when the function does a lot of querying and looping > through large result sets. That's funny, my biggest problems with PL/PgSQL have been (among others) exactly with large result sets... Anyhow, the general idea is: It _does_ matter which one you use, so you'd better test if it matters to you :-) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: