Tom Lane wrote:
> I've spent some time looking into how we can improve our planning of outer
> joins. The current planner code slavishly follows the syntactic join
> order, which can lead to quite bad plans. The reason it does this is that
> in some cases altering the join order of outer joins can change the
> results. However, there are many cases where the results would not be
> changed, and we really need to start taking advantage of those cases.
I wonder if the code is already able to transform right joins to left
joins, like(A rightjoin B on (Pab)) = (B leftjoin A on (Pab))
I haven't looked at the code but I vaguely remember it is possible with
some strings attached, like not being able to use not-mergejoinable
conditions or something. I imagine it shows up as a leftjoin node with
some flag set.
How does this affect this optimization? Does this hold:
(A rightjoin B on (Pab)) innerjoin C on (Pbc)= (B leftjoin A on (Pab)) innerjoin C on (Pbc)= (B innerjoin C on (Pbc))
leftjoinA on (Pab)
?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.