Re: Min Xid problem proposal

Simon Riggs wrote:

> From what's been said VACUUM FREEZE will not alter the fact that a
> frozen table will need vacuuming again in the future and so cannot ever
> be read-only. I can't really see any reason to run VACUUM FREEZE...

Yeah.

> If you want to make a table read-only forever, we need a separate
> command to do that, ISTM.

Let's get this goose cooked and then we can improve it.  This patch has
been waiting on my queue for too long.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.