Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype)

Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Hm.  One of the main problems I found was incorrect results for
> > LONGLONG_MIN (-2^63).  I'm rather tempted to add a test case for
> > that to the int8 regression test and see if any platforms fail ;-)
>
> Done ... let me know whether the back branches still pass regression
> for you ;-)

I checked back to 7.3 and everything passed. I did a cvs update,
configure, gmake, and regression run for each branch.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073