Re: [BUGS] BUG #2052: Federal Agency Tech Hub Refuses to Accept

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [BUGS] BUG #2052: Federal Agency Tech Hub Refuses to Accept
Дата
Msg-id 200511251941.52468.peter_e@gmx.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [BUGS] BUG #2052: Federal Agency Tech Hub Refuses to Accept  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Point 2: CVE is pretty much the industry standard for naming
> vulnerabilities. This is what people *use*. There's no reason *not*
> to provide it as a cross reference. But sure, we shouldn't list only
> the ones that have CVE numbers - if there are any that doesn't, they
> should be listed as well.

Actually, if there are any that don't have a CVE number, then we should 
simply ask for one to be assigned.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2052: Federal Agency Tech Hub Refuses to Accept