Re: [BUGS] BUG #2052: Federal Agency Tech Hub Refuses to Accept

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [BUGS] BUG #2052: Federal Agency Tech Hub Refuses to Accept
Дата
Msg-id 200511251937.17858.peter_e@gmx.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [BUGS] BUG #2052: Federal Agency Tech Hub Refuses to Accept  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [BUGS] BUG #2052: Federal Agency Tech Hub Refuses to Accept  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I am not excited about referencing error numbers from someone else. 
> We know our errors better than anyone else, so I don't see the point.

The point is, *we* might know our error numbers, but the rest of the 
world doesn't.

And CVE isn't just "someone".  A large number of security groups, 
government agencies, and OS distributors are involved there.  Using CVE 
numbers, the public can, say, correlate bugtraq or CERT announcements 
or Red Hat or Debian bugs to PostgreSQL patches and releases.  
Copy-and-pasting the CVE number into the patch message or release note 
entry really isn't that much to ask for that service.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Pollard, Mike"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Doubt
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?