Re: Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim C. Nasby
Тема Re: Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Дата
Msg-id 20051122204924.GF99429@pervasive.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 07:50:48PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Nice analysis, but we can't hack configure like that. It has to be able
> to be fully generated from its sources. I think the other source file
> you would need to look at is config/programs.m4. (Not sure about quoting
> $ac_popdir - why only that one?)
>
> Also, I suspect we'd want to enable the libedit preference with a switch
> rather than just force it, if we want to go this way.

BTW, we've run into issues with readline from a licensing standpoint. It
would be really nice if libedit was supported where practical (I suspect
most mainstream OSes support libedit) since it's BSD licensed.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bind variables, soft vs hard parse
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Time for pgindent?