Re: Comments from a Firebird user via Borland Newsgroups.
| От | Bruno Wolff III |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Comments from a Firebird user via Borland Newsgroups. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20051110034621.GA27411@wolff.to обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Comments from a Firebird user via Borland Newsgroups. (Tony Caduto <tony_caduto@amsoftwaredesign.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Comments from a Firebird user via Borland Newsgroups.
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 19:35:30 -0600, Tony Caduto <tony_caduto@amsoftwaredesign.com> wrote: > <We found PostgreSQL a mature product, but in two things Firebird was > simply better than PostgreSQL: Two-Phase commit (ok, that is gone with > PG 8.1), but the second is a SNAPSHOT / REPEATABLE READ transaction > isolation. I can't live without that when it comes having a stable view > of data during one transaction, or did that change with 8.1? Is there > now a SNAPHOST / REPEATBLE READ transaction isolation level available as > well?> > > Just wondering what the PG take on this snapshot repeatable read stuff is. http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/sql-set-transaction.html http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/transaction-iso.html
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: