Re: Is this a buggy behavior?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Is this a buggy behavior? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2005111.1711293431@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Is this a buggy behavior? (Thiemo Kellner <thiemo@gelassene-pferde.biz>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Is this a buggy behavior?
Re: Is this a buggy behavior? |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Thiemo Kellner <thiemo@gelassene-pferde.biz> writes:
> Am 24.03.2024 um 15:54 schrieb Erik Wienhold:
>> This is required by the SQL standard: columns of a primary key must be
>> NOT NULL. Postgres automatically adds the missing NOT NULL constraints
>> when defining a primary key. You can verify that with \d test1 in psql.
> To me, this behaviour, while correct, is not too concise. I wished, that
> PG issued a warning about a definition conflict. In PostgreSQL, a PK
> must always be not nullable, so explicitly defining on of a PK's columns
> as nullable is contradictory, one should get notified of.
To do that, we'd have to remember that you'd said NULL, which we
don't: the word is just discarded as a noise clause. Considering
that this usage of NULL isn't even permitted by the SQL standard,
that seems like a bit too much work.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: