Re: Improving performance on multicolumn query

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Steinar H. Gunderson
Тема Re: Improving performance on multicolumn query
Дата
Msg-id 20051109124429.GA9127@uio.no
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Improving performance on multicolumn query  (Jan Kesten <jan.kesten@web.de>)
Ответы Re: Improving performance on multicolumn query
Список pgsql-performance
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 01:08:07PM +0100, Jan Kesten wrote:
> Now my problem: I need really many queries of rows using it's primary
> key and fetching about five different columns but these are quite slow
> (about 10 queries per second and as I have some other databases which
> can have about 300 queries per second I think this is slow):
>
> transfer=> explain analyse SELECT * FROM test WHERE test_a=9091150001
> AND test_b=1 AND test_c=2 AND test_d=0 AND test_e=0;
>
>  Index Scan using test_idx on test  (cost=0.00..50.27 rows=1 width=1891)
> (actual time=0.161..0.167 rows=1 loops=1)
>    Index Cond: (test_a = 9091150001::bigint)
>    Filter: ((test_b = 1) AND (test_c = 2) AND (test_d = 0) AND (test_e 0))

You don't post your table definitions (please do), but it looks like test_b,
test_c, test_d and test_e might be bigints? If so, you may want to do
explicit "AND test_b=1::bigint AND test_c=2::bigint" etc. -- 7.4 doesn't
figure this out for you. (8.0 and higher does.)

/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Improving performance on multicolumn query
Следующее
От: Charlie Savage
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Sort performance on large tables