Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Martijn van Oosterhout
Тема Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data
Дата
Msg-id 20051105104005.GA2293@svana.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data  (Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 07:15:22PM -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Other lame aspects of using unicode encodings other than UTF-8
> internally is that it's harder to figure out what is text in GDB
> output and such.. can make debugging more difficult.

Yeah, that's one of the reasons I think UTF-16 should be restricted to
userdata only. There's no particular reason why system tables and
indexes need to be in a locale sensetive collate order. If someone
really wants that they can pay for the conversion costs at query time.

The problem is that PostgreSQL doesn't support multiple collate orders,
that's being worked on though.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jochem van Dieten
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Exclusive lock for database rename
Следующее
От: Martijn van Oosterhout
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Exclusive lock for database rename