Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com> writes:
> > On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 06:17:53PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> This won't do as a permanent patch, because it isn't guaranteed to fix
> >> the problem on machines that don't strongly order writes, but it should
> >> work on Opterons, at least well enough to confirm the diagnosis.
>
> > Given your proposed fix on -patches, do you still need me to test this?
>
> Yes; we still need to verify that my theory actually explains your
> problem. Given that I'm positing that you can repeatedly hit a
> two-instruction window, this is by no means a sure thing. We need
> it tested (and with asserts on, so that we can tell if it's fixed
> the problem or not).
>
> > Also, is there any heap corruption risk associated with this patch?
>
> Look, Jim, I'm trying to help you fix this. Are you going to help or not?
> If you want some kind of written guarantee, you're not going to get one.
I think we can say Jim gets his money back if he finds a bug. :-)
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073