Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)", File: "nbtsearch.c", Line: 89)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Martijn van Oosterhout
Тема Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)", File: "nbtsearch.c", Line: 89)
Дата
Msg-id 20051026211411.GA773@svana.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)", File: "nbtsearch.c", Line: 89)  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
Ответы Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)", File: "nbtsearch.c", Line: 89)  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 04:03:41PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Is this something that should be logged better than it is? Is there any
> value in trying to save the index/table that's busted?

Unfortuatly, it's one of those Assert(expr) lines, they don't generally
give the opportunity for extra debug data. They're usually not even
compiled in...

> Yeah, looks like no core files yet (they would be in $PGDATA somewhere,
> correct?), so I had them hack their startup script to include ulimit -c
> unlimited. Luckily this is pretty reproducable, so hopefully we'll have
> a core soon.

Well, you know the query that generates it? EXPLAIN should tell you the
indexes it's using, so you could just REINDEX those...

Or REINDEX them all... :)

Hope this helps,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: slower merge join on sorted data chosen over
Следующее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: sort_mem statistics ...