Re: A costing analysis tool
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: A costing analysis tool |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200510191058.50324.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: A costing analysis tool ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin, > When it gets downt to the detail, it may make sense to combine > or split some of these. For example, runtime_options should > probably not have a column for each currently known option, > but a child table which maps to all non-default option values. I'm a little cautious about storing only non-defaults; the defaults have changed from version to version, after all. If we did that, we'd need to have a "defaults" table in the db as a reference list. Also, we'll need to store runtime options both on the "machine" level and on the "query" level, in order to allow testing of changing an enable_* or other query cost option at runtime. Not sure how to capture this, though. -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: