Re: Is Postgres comparable to MSSQL
| От | Andrew Sullivan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Is Postgres comparable to MSSQL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20051018185529.GJ3441@phlogiston.dyndns.org обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Is Postgres comparable to MSSQL ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 12:11:59PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > Can we get any of that on the website somewhere? Afilias has been a pretty open user (and we're not in the league of some of those users, I understand). I have an unpleasant feeling that I've contributed to the hold up of our case study's posting; but in the meantime, if people want to use it, here's an old link with the arguments we used to make PostgreSQL palatable to the ICANN community. "What's a PostgreSQL" is not a question we hear much any more, but in 2002 it was still a big problem: http://icann.org/tlds/org/questions-to-applicants-13.htm A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca This work was visionary and imaginative, and goes to show that visionary and imaginative work need not end up well. --Dennis Ritchie
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: