Re: Oracle buys Innobase
| От | Robert Treat |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Oracle buys Innobase |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200510172050.28262.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Oracle buys Innobase (Robert Bernier <robert.bernier5@sympatico.ca>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Oracle buys Innobase
|
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Monday 17 October 2005 18:09, Robert Bernier wrote:
> On Monday 17 October 2005 17:47, Chris Travers wrote:
> > Robert Bernier wrote:
> > >Hey, don't forget MySQL AB is a European company. This won't fly like it
> > > would in the US, the anti-trust laws are stricter.
> >
> > Why not? One would be hard to argue that removing MySQL from the market
> > place would have any adverse effect on competition. Are competitors
> > then never allowed to merge in the EU? Besides who would have standing
> > to sue? IANAL though and I am an American so I could misunderstand
> > something pretty fundamental.
>
> In canada we have a thing called the competition bureau, a company is not
> allowed to buy another company if its to reduce competition
>
By that definition no company could ever buy any other company even if they
wanted a mutual merger, so I don't think that is the case. Oracle buying
my$ql wouldn't even cause the legislature to blink... if you dont believe me
just look at the track record of oracle with peoplesoft/sap, a market where
there really isn't much competition, unlike the db market where there are a
least a dozen legitimate competitors in the field. More importantly, my$ql
has said themselves numerous times they "don't compete with oracle" so using
there own words you can't put oracle on an anti-competitive practice
(whoops!).
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: