Re: Documentation typos

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Fuhr
Тема Re: Documentation typos
Дата
Msg-id 20051013145120.GA91978@winnie.fuhr.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Documentation typos  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: Documentation typos
Список pgsql-patches
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:55:55AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> You seem to have lots of time on your hands if you can worry about this.
> How you spend it is your business, of course, but playing spelling cop
> doesn't seem worth it to me.

Whether you agree or not, some people judge a product in part by
the quality of its documentation.  Spelling mistakes detract from
that quality, and since it takes only a few minutes with a spellchecker
to find and fix them, the effort does seem worth it to me.  You
might consider that statements such as the above only discourage
people from taking such efforts.

Regarding American vs. British spelling, my spellchecker flagged
the latter, so I did a quick grep to see which was the more prevalent
in the rest of the documentation and made them all the same for
consistency.  It doesn't matter to me which we use, but my vote
would be that we use one form consistently rather than mix them.

--
Michael Fuhr

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Documentation typos
Следующее
От: Neil Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Documentation typos