Re: Oracle buys Innobase
| От | felix@crowfix.com |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Oracle buys Innobase |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20051008211154.GA20723@crowfix.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Oracle buys Innobase ("Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Oracle buys Innobase
Re: Oracle buys Innobase Re: Oracle buys Innobase Re: Oracle buys Innobase Re: Oracle buys Innobase Re: Oracle buys Innobase Re: Oracle buys Innobase |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 10:31:30AM -0500, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> What it comes down to is this. MySQL is dual licensed. You can use
> the GPL version, or the commercial version. In order to sell the
> commercially licensed version, MySQL must have the rights to all the
> code in their base. So, in order for MySQL to sell a commercail
> version of MySQL with innodb support, they have to pay innobase a
> bit to include it, or rip it out.
I don't understand. If both MySQL and Innodb are GPL licensed,
commercial or not should make no difference, and they can add all the
GPL changes they want o the last Innodb GPL release.
What am I missing?
--
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / felix@crowfix.com
GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: