Re: BUG #1948: Enhancement Request - INSERT syntax

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim C. Nasby
Тема Re: BUG #1948: Enhancement Request - INSERT syntax
Дата
Msg-id 20051008195218.GR36108@pervasive.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на BUG #1948: Enhancement Request - INSERT syntax  ("test_autoincrement" <tony@marston-home.demon.co.uk>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 12:49:58PM +0100, test_autoincrement wrote:
> This is not user-friendly, and I think the SQL committee made a big mistake
> in defining totally different structures for the INSERT and UPDATE
> statements.
Matter of opinion.

> MySQL already offers this option, so why can't you?

MySQL also thinks it's OK to truncate data. Comparing PostgreSQL to them
isn't a very good way to go about getting a feature added.

Ultimately, I highly doubt that anyone on -hackers has any interest in
this, so it's very unlikely to get done unless you do it yourself (or
pay someone to do it). Even then I suspect -hackers might reject it.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Tony Marston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #1937: Parts of information_schema only accessible to owner
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function