Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Marc G. Fournier
Тема Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?
Дата
Msg-id 20051007140719.L1477@ganymede.hub.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?  (Anjali.Sinha@relianceinfo.com)
Список pgsql-hackers
See the bottom of the email that has links to how to unsubscribe from the
list .. *all* lists have this appended to the bottom of the emails ...

On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Anjali.Sinha@relianceinfo.com wrote:

> Unsubscribe me. Or Can anyone forward me the emailId of the concerned
> person..??
>
> Regards,
> Anjali Sinha
> ASCG, Reliance Infocomm
> J Block, SB-11, 2nd Floor,
> Dhirubhai Ambani Knowledge City,
> Thane Belapur Road, New Mumbai India, 400 709
> DID: 91 22 30387862
> ____________________________________________
>
>
>
>                      Alvaro Herrera
>                      <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.or        To:       Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
>                      g>                             cc:       Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>, Robert Treat
>                      Sent by:                        <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org,
(bcc:Anjali 
>                      pgsql-hackers-owner@pos         Sinha/INFOCOMM/RIL)
>                      tgresql.org                    Subject:  Re: [HACKERS] Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?
>                                               Importance: Normal  Sender's OU: Reliance |------------------|
>                                                                                         | [ ] Confidential |
>                      10/07/2005 09:38 PM                                                |------------------|
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:56:50AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>> No, because you can't overload based purely on return type. I suppose
>>> they could write it to take an int8 pid or something, but that's a
> hack.
>>
>> Well, how many people want to vote for Andreas' suggestion of having
>> both
>>
>>            int pg_cancel_backend(int)
>>            bool pg_backend_cancel(int)
>>
>> with the former deprecated but still there for backward compatibility?
>
> +1
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/DXLWNGRJD34
> "Siempre hay que alimentar a los dioses, aunque la tierra esté seca"
> (Orual)
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Marc G. Fournier"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?
Следующее
От: Andreas Pflug
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?