Re: Dump all except some tables?
От | David Fetter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Dump all except some tables? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20051007001224.GE30487@fetter.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Dump all except some tables? ("Roger Hand" <RHand@kailea.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Dump all except some tables?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 04:31:14PM -0700, Roger Hand wrote: > > From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org > > [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Jim C. Nasby > > Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 3:34 PM > > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Dump all except some tables? > > > > ... I find myself wondering if it would be good to allow for > > specifying a set of rules for what to dump in a file, probably > > something like a set of regexes with a way to specify if it's an > > include or exclude rule. Seems like it would be a heck of a lot > > simpler to do that for complex cases than deal with a pile of > > spaghetti on the command-line > > It may be useful to cut down on command line clutter if one could > specify a file holding a list of table names to include/exclude. Here's my thoughts on a summary: [-t [table | glob]]... # 0 or more -t options [-T [table | glob]]... # 0 or more -T options [--include-tables-from-file f] [--exclude-tables-from-file f] where globs get expanded just the way they are in psql, and the exclude is evaluated after the include to remove any tables where they might conflict. I don't think regex matching is needed or good. Does this make sense? Cheers, D -- David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778 Remember to vote!
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: