Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Martijn van Oosterhout
Тема Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
Дата
Msg-id 20051004152336.GI17589@svana.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?  (mark@mark.mielke.cc)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 03:56:53PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I've been using gcc 3.4 and saw no warning when using either "-Winline"
> or "-O3 -Winline".

Ok, I've just installed 3.4 and verified that. I examined the asm code
and gcc is inlining it. I concede, at this point just throw in -Winline
and monitor the situation.

As an aside, the *_getattr calls end up a bit suboptimal though. It's
producing code like:
 cmp attlen, 4 je $elsewhere1 cmp attlen, 2 je $elsewhere2 ld byte
here:

--- much later ---
elsewhere1: ld integer jmp $here
elsewhere2: ld short jmp $here

No idea whether we want to go down the path of hinting to gcc which
size will be the most common.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: effective SELECT from child tables
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Vacuum and Transactions