Is there enough for a TODO here?
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 11:24:30PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
>
> Hannu Krosing <hannu@skype.net> writes:
>
> > On P, 2005-10-02 at 23:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >
> > > Here's another interesting case to think about:
> > >
> > > ALTER TABLE ADD foo integer DEFAULT 1
> > > ...
> > > ALTER TABLE ALTER foo SET DEFAULT 2
> > >
> > > You'll have to pay the table-traversal cost on one step or the other.
> >
> > The second, ALTER ... SET DEFAULT, would only set default for newly
> > inserted columns, not the ones which are missing due to tuples being
> > created before the column existed.
>
> Hm. So you're saying there are only ever exactly two types of defaults. The
> "initial" default that applies to all tuples that were created before the
> column was added. And the "current" default that only ever applies to newly
> created tuples.
>
> That does seem to cleanly close this hole.
>
> --
> greg
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461