Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition
| От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20051003131716.GB15212@svana.org обсуждение |
| Ответ на | PG Killed by OOM Condition ("John Hansen" <john@geeknet.com.au>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 11:03:06PM +1000, John Hansen wrote:
> Might it be worth while protecting the postmaster from an OOM Kill on
> Linux by setting /proc/{pid}/oom_adj to -17 ?
> (Described vaguely in mm/oom_kill.c)
Has it actually happened to you? PostgreSQL is pretty good about its
memory usage. Besides, seems to me it should be an system admisitrator
descision.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: